|
|
► Path = Home > Legal Aspects > Legal Initiatives Comparison | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There are a whole series of differences between:
The two sets of inquiries were about a different possible violator of a different body of rules enforced by different people. Note also that the request made to the Ethics Commissioner was about possible inducement of Mr. Emerson, whereas Subsection 482(b) is about inducement of voters, and hence more “grass roots” in nature. Figure 2 summarizes the preceding differences:
Another difference worth stressing is that the Canada Elections Act inquiry was just about Mr. Emerson's switching of political parties, whereas the House of Commons Code inquiry was about Mr. Emerson switching parties and taking a Cabinet position (in their requests for an inquiry, Mr. Julian, Mr. Easter, and Mr. Wilfert all suggested that the latter was the inducement for the former). ► More on the inquiry into Section 8 of the House of Commons Conflict of Interest Code.
► More on the request for an opinion about Subsection 482(b) of the Canada Elections Act.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
top |
6749 |
14-Aug-2007 |